Charles Clanton Rogers

Reflections based on poetry, music, visual art, book reviews, history of science, first-person history, philosophical essays and International Blogging

https://clanton1934.files.wordpress.com/2015/09/56-the-earl-of-essex-his-galliard-p-42-_can-she-excuse_.m4aphoto27211The importance of the Torah in The Literature of Western Culture

Unknown-4    with  bbnewsab (PV)

To read the Western Canon one must know at least the vocabulary of  The Tyndal Bible which starts with The Christian “Old Testament”, which is The Hebrew Bible.
The Tyndale Bible (Coverdale, ed.) was the Bible of Shakespeare and Elizabethan period; not superseded until revised as The King James Version in 1611.

Tyndale’s words and phrases influenced between sixty and eighty percent of The King James Bible of 1611 and in that second life, his words and phrases circled the globe. (1) William_Tyndale

We use Tyndale’s words today: “scapegoat,”“let there be light,” “the powers that be,” “my brother’s keeper,” “filthy lucre,” “fight the good fight,” “sick unto death,” “flowing with milk and honey,” “the apple of his eye,” “a man after his own heart,” “the spirit is willing but the flesh is weak,” “signs of the times,” “ye of little faith,” “eat, drink and be merry,” “broken-hearted,”“clear-eyed.” And hundreds more: “fisherman,”“landlady,”“sea-shore,”“stumbling-block,”“taskmaster,”“two-edged,”“viper,”“zealous” and even “Jehovah” and “Passover” come into English through Tyndale. “Beautiful,” a word that had meant only human beauty, was considerably widened by Tyndale, as were many others.(3) Other words that find their genesis in Tyndale’s linguistic skills include: fig leaves, birthright, ingathering, sin offering, morning watch, handbreadth, spoiler, swaddling clothes, slaughter, and ministering. In addition, there are numerous words that find their first usage in Tyndale’s New Testament (1526– 34), including apostleship, brotherly, busybody, castaway, chasten, dividing, fisherman, godly, holy place, intercession, Jehovah, justifier, live, log, mercy seat, Passover, scapegoat, taskmaster, unbeliever, Viper, and zealous. Biographer David Teems quotes Stephen Greenblatt as saying, “Without Tyndale’s New Testament … it ‘s hard to imagine William Shakespeare, the playwright.”(4) Even Shakespeare must concede that he is an heir to this grand translator of the Scriptures. Repeatedly, Shakespeare uses words and phrases that he has obviously adopted from Tyndale’s New Testament. For example, in A Midsummer Night’s Dream, Shakespeare writes:

“The eye of man hath not heard, the ear of man hath not seen, man’s hand is not able to taste, his tongue to conceive, nor his heart to report, what my dream was.”

Tyndale’s translation of 1 Corinthians 2: 9 in the 1526 edition of his New Testament reads,:

“The eye hath not seen, and the ear hath not heard, neither hath entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love Him.”

When Shakespeare was learning to read and write at the community school at Stratford on Avon, Latin was the essential language, but he learned his English from Tyndale’s Bible.  (Shakespeare’s probable schooling dates 1569-1579. He wrote from 1590-1611. The KJV was not initiated until 1607 and not published until 1611) (1) 45d1fd3f398678452fd02153f569ce01

The  Canon of  Western Civilization  

images-7

William Shakespeare
Dante Alighieri
Geoffrey Chaucer
Miguel de Cervantes
Michel de Montaigne
Molière
John Milton
Samuel Johnson
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
William Wordsworth
Jane Austen
Walt Whitman
Emily Dickinson
Charles Dickens
George Eliot
Leo Tolstoy
Henrik Ibsen
Sigmund Freud
Marcel Proust
James Joyce
Virginia Woolf
Franz Kafka
Jorge Luis Borges
Pablo Neruda
Fernando Pessoa
Samuel Beckett

The Torah maintains that the righteous Gentiles of all nations (those observing the Seven Laws of Noah, listed below) have a place in the World to Come. But not all religious Gentiles earn eternal life by virtue of observing their religion:

While it is recognized that Moslems worship the same God that we do (though calling him Allah, He is the same God of Israel), even those who follow the tenets of their religion cannot be considered righteous in the eyes of God, because they do not accept that the Written Torah in the hands of the Jews today is the original Torah given by God, and they do not accept the Seven Laws of Noah as binding on them.
While the Christians do generally accept the Hebrew Bible as truly from God, many of them (those who accept the so-called divinity of Jesus) are idolaters according to the Torah, punishable by death, and certainly will not enjoy the World to Come. But it is not just a member of a denomination in which the majority are believers in the Trinity that is idolatry, but personal idolatrous practice, whatever the individual’s affiliation.
Contrary to popular belief, the Torah does not maintain that Jews are necessarily better than other people simply because they are Jews. Although we are God’s chosen people, we do not believe that God chose the Jews because of any inherent superiority. According to a story in the Talmud, God offered the Torah to all the nations of the earth, and the Jews were the only ones who accepted it. According to another story, the Jews were offered the Torah last and received it only because God held a mountain over their heads! Another traditional story suggests that God chose the Jews because they were the lowliest of nations, and their success would be attributed to God’s might rather than their ability. Clearly, these are not the ideas of people who think they are inherently better than other nations.

Because of our acceptance of Torah, Jews have a special status in the eyes of God, but we lose that special status when we abandon Torah. Furthermore, the blessings that we received from God by accepting the Torah come with a high price: Jews have a greater responsibility than non-Jews. While non-Jews are only obligated to obey the seven commandments given to Noah, Jews are responsible for fulfilling the 613 mitzvot in the Torah, thus God will punish Jews for doing many things that would not be a sin for non-Jews.

(1)  Bragg, Melvin, Adventures in English

(2)  mtr@mechon-mamre.org

(3)  Rogers, CC,  http://therogerspost.com/2015/05/28/english-language/ ‎

2 thoughts on “Blogger’s GPS – Literature of Western Civilization – Part Two – The Torah

  1. bbnewsab says:

    Since you mention God Almighty in this excellent post, KK, I want to make an amendment to it – in order to shed some light on the “divine” development from oneness to triunity and (the Christian dogma of) trinity.

    Here are two articles that try to answer the question how this Israelite God you descibe in your blog post above later on became three gods? At the same time different but yet the same as the original one.

    1) http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Triune+God ; and

    2) http://www.patheos.com/blogs/allergicpagan/2014/11/13/the-secret-history-of-the-triple-goddess-part-1-triads-triplicities-and-trinities/

    And why not have a look at http://evolutionofgod.net/ . About the evolution of god(s).

    For those followers utterly interested in the origin of god(s) I also recommend this Wikipedia article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monolatrism

    It’s about the differences between monotheism, henotheism and monolatrism. How many God believers have even heard all of these three religious terms?

    Here’s a quote from the Wikipedia article:

    Monolatrism or monolatry (Greek: μόνος (monos) = single, and λατρεία (latreia) = worship) is the recognition of the existence of many gods, but with the consistent worship of only one [of these deities, the one who has the greatest powers and “qualifications”].

    Monolatry is distinguished from monotheism, which asserts the existence of only one god [all other god pretenders are just false and fake], and henotheism, a religious system in which the believer worships one god alone without denying that others may worship different gods with equal validity.

    So in my opinion it’s much easier to be an atheist because then you need not be mulling whether you are a monolatristic, monotheistic or henotheistic god worshipper. 🙂

    Like

    1. clanton1934 says:

      Thaks bbnewsab for a scholarly discussion on human’s kind struggle with his mortality a persistent constructions in attempts bargin with an hypothesised force that he doesn’t understand but fears.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Food for Poetryy

eat, sip, travel, click, pen down poetry = Helps best reflect on life !

The Wine Wankers

G’day, you’re at the best wine blog ever! We're all about wine; without the wankery.

Faraday's Candle

It's an amazing world of science...let's go exploring!

しまやん徒然旅日記

(旧・しまやん香港アジア支局) 人生は旅のすべて、日々を綴っていきます。

L.T. Garvin

Eclectic blog: short fiction, poetry, humor, occasional dreams and wild book schemes.

autumnacorn

hand knits + patterns inspired by nature

Exploring the history of prisoner health

Prisoners, Medical Care and Entitlement to Health in England and Ireland, 1850-2000

Fiction All Day

Writing and Life ~ by David Ben-Ami

Logical Quotes

Logical and Inspirational quotes

A Narcissist Writes Letters, To Himself

A Hopefully Formerly Depressed Human Vows To Practice Self-Approval

Leonard Durso

"Literature is language charged with meaning." Ezra Pound

%d bloggers like this: